Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Commitments and Contingencies

v3.20.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Operating Lease Commitment

 

On August 21, 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement (“August 2017 Lease Agreement”) for commercial lease of office space, pursuant to which the Company agreed to lease 32,733 square feet of office space (“Leased Premises”). The initial term of the August 2017 Lease Agreement was for a period of seven years which began with the Company’s occupancy of the Leased Premises in February 2018. The base rent for the Leased Premises ranged from approximately $470,000 for the first year to approximately $908,000 for the seventh year. Per the terms of the August 2017 Lease Agreement, the landlord agreed to reimburse the Company for $1,080,189 of leasehold improvements. The reimbursements had been deferred and were to be recognized as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease. Additionally, the August 2017 Lease Agreement required a standby irrevocable letter of credit of $400,000, which was to be reduced, if the Company is not in default under the August 2017 Lease Agreement, to $300,000 and $200,000 on the third and fourth anniversary of the commencement date, respectively, The Company entered into an unsecured letter of credit for $400,000 in connection with the August 2017 Lease Agreement for which it incurred interest expense of $19,025 and $7,431 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 using the effective date method as of January 1, 2019 and recorded a lease liability of approximately $3.8 million, and a right-of-use asset of approximately $2.4 million, with no operations adjustment to the accumulated deficit related to the Leased Premises. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities, current and operating lease liabilities, noncurrent in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

 

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the date of adoption based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments, which was 9%. This is the rate the Company would have to pay if borrowing on a collateralized basis over a similar term to each lease. The ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

On February 26, 2019, the Company amended its lease (“February 2019 Lease Agreement”) pursuant to which an additional 30,023 square feet of office space (“New Premises”) will be leased by the Company in the same building for an aggregate total of 62,756 square feet of leased office space (“Total Premises”). Per ASC 842, the February 2019 Lease Agreement constitutes a modification as it extends the original lease term and increases the scope of the lease (additional space provided under the amendment), which requires evaluation of the remeasurement of the lease liability and corresponding ROU asset. Accordingly, the Company reassessed the classification of the Leased Premises and remeasured the lease liability on the basis of the extended lease term using the 20 additional monthly rent payments and the incremental borrowing rate at the effective date of the modification of 9%. The remeasurement for the modification resulted in an increase to the lease liability and the ROU asset of approximately $855,000. The Company determined that the New Premises will be treated as a new standalone operating lease under ASC 842 and recorded a lease liability and a right-of-use asset of approximately $2.7 million for this lease.

 

Per the terms of the February 2019 Lease Agreement, the landlord agreed to reimburse the Company for $990,759 of leasehold improvements. The reimbursements are being recognized as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease. Additionally, the February 2019 Lease Agreement required a standby irrevocable letter of credit of $369,900, which may be reduced, if the Company is not in default under the February 2019 Lease Agreement, to $277,425 and $184,950 on the third and fourth anniversary of the commencement date, respectively.

 

On October 25, 2019, the Company amended its lease (“October 2019 Lease Amendment”) pursuant to which the term of the lease was extended through November 30, 2026 and the existing office space under lease was expanded by 500 square feet for an aggregate total of 63,256 square feet of leased office space (“Amended Total Premises”). Per ASC 842, the October 2019 Lease Amendment constitutes a modification as it extends the original lease term and increases the scope of the lease (additional space provided under the amendment), which requires evaluation of the remeasurement of the lease liability and corresponding ROU asset. The additional space did not result in a separate contract as the rent increase was determined not to be commensurate with the standalone price for the additional right of use. Accordingly, the Company reassessed the classification of the Amended Total Premises, which resulted in operating classification, and remeasured the lease liability on the basis of the extended lease term using the additional monthly rent payments and the incremental borrowing rate at the effective date of the modification of 8%. The remeasurement for the modification resulted in an increase to the lease liability and the ROU asset of approximately $381,000 that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019.

 

The following table contains a summary of the lease costs recognized under ASC 842 and other information pertaining to the Company’s operating leases for the year ended December 31, 2019:

 

Lease cost      
Operating lease cost   $ 1,025,899  
Total lease cost   $ 1,025,899  
         
Other information        
Operating cash flows received for operating leases   $ 338,435  
Weighted average remaining lease term     6.9 years  
Weighted average discount rate     8.00 %

 

Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $1,025,899 and $587,963, respectively.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s non-cancelable lease agreements in effect at December 31, 2019, the following table summarizes the Company’s maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019:

 

Year ending December 31, 2019:

 

2020   $ 1,265,760  
2021     1,605,121  
2022     1,652,563  
2023     1,700,005  
2024     1,747,447  
Thereafter     3,483,034  
Total lease payments   $ 11,453,929  
         
Less: imputed interest     (2,760,957 )
Total   $ 8,692,973  

 

The following disclosures as of December 31, 2018 continue to be in accordance with ASC 840. Future minimum lease payments for operating leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:

 

2019   $ 623,958  
2020     784,243  
2021     830,600  
2022     855,150  
2023     879,699  
Thereafter     1,055,639  
Total   $ 5,029,289  

 

Capital Lease Commitment

 

The lease payments under the capital lease agreement for the copier machine commenced when the machine was placed in service in January 2016. The lease was for a three-year term that concluded in January 2019 and included a bargain purchase option at the end of the term.

 

The following disclosures as of December 31, 2018 continue to be in accordance with ASC 840. Future minimum lease payments for capital leases as of December 31, 2018 was as follows:

 

Total future minimum lease payments – end in 2019   $ 378  
Less: interest     (3 )
Future capital lease obligations     375  
Less: current portion     (375 )
Long-term portion   $  

 

For commitments under the Company’s development award agreements- see Note 9.