Significant Accounting Policies
|9 Months Ended|
Sep. 30, 2017
|Accounting Policies [Abstract]|
|Significant Accounting Policies||
A summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of the financial statements is as follows:
Use of Estimates
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and changes in estimates may occur. The most significant estimates are related to the expected performance period under the Company’s development award agreement with CFFT (See Note 8), stock based compensation and the accrual of research, product development and clinical obligations.
Prior to the registration of its common stock and the subsequent public listing of the common stock, the Company had granted stock options at exercise prices not less than the fair value of its common stock as determined by the board of directors, with input from management. The Company’s board of directors determined the estimated fair value of the common stock based on a number of objective and subjective factors, including external market conditions affecting the biotechnology industry sector and the historic prices at which the Company sold shares of preferred stock.
The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, specifically in the presentation of the cash flow statement for the comparable prior period as a result of the Company’s early adoption in the fourth quarter of 2016 of ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires companies to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows and as a result, transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents will no longer be presented in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is being applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The impact on prior periods was not material to the Company’s financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers only those investments which are highly liquid, readily convertible to cash, and that mature within three months from date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Marketable investments are those with maturities in excess of three months. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, cash equivalents were comprised of money market funds. The Company had no marketable investments at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Restricted cash as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 included a $150,000 collateral account for the Company’s corporate credit cards and is classified in current assets. Additionally, as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 restricted cash included a stand-by letter of credit issued in favor of a landlord for $50,000 which was classified in current assets as of September 30, 2017 and in noncurrent assets as of December 31, 2016 (See Note 5).
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value based on the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying values of the notes payable approximate their fair value due to their market terms.
Property and Equipment
The estimated life for the Company’s property and equipment is as follows: three years for computer hardware and software and three to five years for office furniture and equipment. The Company’s leasehold improvements and assets under capital lease are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the respective leases. See Note 4 for details of property and equipment and Note 5 for operating and capital lease commitments.
Research and Development Expenses and Collaborative Research Agreements
Costs incurred for research and development are expensed as incurred.
For amounts received under the development award from the CFFT (See Note 8), the Company is recognized those amounts when the triggering event to receive those payments occurred, with those amounts being amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected duration of the remaining performance period of the development program under the award, which concluded in the third quarter of 2017.
Accruals for Research and Development Expenses and Clinical Trials
As part of the process of preparing its financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its expenses resulting from its obligations under contracts with vendors, clinical research organizations and consultants and under clinical site agreements in connection with conducting clinical trials. The financial terms of these contracts are subject to negotiations, which vary from contract to contract and may result in payment terms that do not match the periods over which materials or services are provided under such contracts. The Company’s objective is to reflect the appropriate expenses in its financial statements by matching those expenses with the period in which services are performed and efforts are expended. The Company accounts for these expenses according to the timing of various aspects of the expenses. The Company determines accrual estimates by taking into account discussion with applicable personnel and outside service providers as to the progress of clinical trials, or the services completed. During the course of a clinical trial, the Company adjusts its clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from its estimates. The Company makes estimates of its accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date based on the facts and circumstances known to it at that time. The Company’s clinical trial accruals are dependent upon the timely and accurate reporting of contract research organizations and other third-party vendors. Although the Company does not expect its estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, its understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and may result in it reporting amounts that are too high or too low for any particular period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no material adjustments to the Company’s prior period estimates of accrued expenses for clinical trials.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentration of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other hedging arrangements. The Company may from time to time have cash in banks in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. However, the Company believes the risk of loss is minimal as these banks are large financial institutions.
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is used by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. To date, the Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as one operating segment, which is developing and commercializing therapeutics to treat rare life-threating, inflammatory fibrotic diseases. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all of the Company’s assets were located in the United States.
For federal and state income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based upon temporary differences between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are based upon prescribed rates and enacted laws applicable to periods in which differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce a net deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that the tax benefit from the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, given the cumulative losses since inception, the Company has provided a valuation allowance equal to 100% of the tax asset in order to eliminate the deferred tax assets amounts.
Tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns are required to be evaluated to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet a more-likely-than-not threshold, as well as accrued interest and penalties, if any, would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. There were no uncertain tax positions that require accrual or disclosure to the financial statements as of September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when expected undiscounted cash flows of an asset are less than an asset’s carrying value. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of such assets in relation to the operating performance and future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying assets. An impairment loss equal to the excess of the fair value of the asset over its carrying amount, is recorded when it is determined that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. No impairment charges were recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
The Company recognizes compensation costs resulting from the issuance of stock-based awards to employees, non-employees and directors as an expense in the statement of operations over the service period based on a measurement of fair value for each stock-based award. The fair value of each option grant is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value is amortized as compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. Stock options granted to non-employee consultants are revalued at the end of each reporting period until vested and the changes in their fair value are recorded as adjustments to expense over the related vesting period.
Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share of the Company’s common stock has been computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For years in which there is a net loss, options, warrants and convertible securities are anti-dilutive and therefore are excluded from diluted loss per share calculations. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
The following potentially dilutive securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been excluded from the computation of dilutive weighted average shares outstanding for the computation of dilutive net loss per share as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive
On October 26, 2017, the Company consummated an underwritten public offering of shares of its common stock pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 4,650,000 shares of its common stock to institutional investors at a purchase price of $7.00 per share with net proceeds to the Company totaling approximately $30,397,000 (“October 2017 Offering”) (See Notes 9 and 13).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance codified in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue Recognition — Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) which amends the guidance in former ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, and is effective for public companies for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Specifically, the new standard differs from the current accounting standard in many respects, such as in the accounting for variable consideration received, including milestone payments or contingent payments. Under the Company’s current accounting policy, milestone payments are initially recognized as revenue only in the period that the payment-triggering event occurred or was achieved (See Note 8). ASC 606, however, may require to recognize such payments before the payment-triggering event is completely achieved based on the Company’s estimate of the amount of consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for transferring the services, subject to management’s assessment of whether it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The Company plans to adopt ASC 606 in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective method according to which the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 is recognized at the date of initial application. Since the Company has concluded its performance obligations and has completed recognizing revenue under the collaboration agreement with CFFT in the three months ended September 30, 2017 (See Note 8) and since the Company has not yet commercialized its product, the Company does not expect to have a cumulative effect at the date of adoption or for the adoption of ASC 606 to have a material effect on its financial statements. If and when the Company will sign new collaboration or revenue generating agreements, the Company will assess the accounting for those new agreements under ASC 606.
Accounting for Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). Under ASU 2016-02, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, ASU 2016-02 will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 will take effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. Management has not yet determined if it will adopt ASU 2016-02 earlier than the required adoption date. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have an impact on the Company’s financial position as the Company has operating lease commitments for office space as of September 30, 2017 with future non-cancelable lease payments amounting to $5,543,755 (see Note 5) for which ASU 2016-02 would apply.
Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 took effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. In the first quarter of 2017, when the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 it did not elect to account for forfeitures as they occur but rather to continue to estimate forfeitures at grant date. As a result the adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity.
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef